Make plans for the 2006 ASNE convention now and get the early-bird rate

The November- December 2005 issue of The American Editor has been posted

ASNE schedule of events

Learn about the ASNE Awards

ASNE Job Fair schedule

· Statement of Principles   · Codes of Ethics
· Committee Reports   · Convention Proceedings
· Fundamental Documents   · Minutes
· News releases   · Reports and Studies
· The American Editor   · The Campfire Project
Page Location: Home » Archives » News releases » 1998 news releases
ASNE testifies against proposed Privacy Protection Act

Published: May 21, 1998
Last Updated: May 21, 1998
Printer-friendly version

RESTON, Va. — A representative of the leading newspaper editors group in the United States testified Thursday that the proposed Privacy Protection Act will put a straitjacket on all forms of media — not just the intended targets, supermarket and television tabloids.

Despite the bill’s optimistic goal of protecting celebrities from the tabloid press, it "would protect villains, frauds and scoundrels against diligent photojournalists who would bring them and their activities to light," said Paul C. Tash, executive editor of the St. Petersburg (Fla.) Times and chair of the Freedom of Information Committee of the American Society of Newspaper Editors. Tash's statement is here.

The proposed legislation would make it illegal for journalists to persistently follow or chase someone to capture an image. The legislation was introduced last fall after the death of Princess Diana, when paparazzi behavior drew public outcry.

Speaking before the House Judiciary Committee, Tash described his own newspaper’s exhaustive attempts to get a photograph of a camera-shy embezzler who was involved in a possible fraud against the National Baptist Convention — attempts that would be illegal under the proposed privacy act.

The subject stayed holed up in her Milwaukee home for three days, never venturing into a public place. After waiting outside her home all this time and getting nothing, the Times photographer asked and received permission from a nearby business to shoot from its roof. It was from there that he took a photo that appeared in the newspaper.

"This assignment was expensive for the newspaper and dreadful for the photographer," Tash said. "We went to these lengths … because it was important that our readers see her, not just read about what she had done in the past."

The privacy bill expands the definition of trespassing to cover telephoto lenses and powerful listening devices. Journalists who use such devices could be punished if they publish material that could only have been obtained through trespassing. It would make all journalists’ jobs harder while making it easier for some villains to stay in the shadows, Tash said.

"(It) would create a new law that is directed specifically toward photojournalists, and make them susceptible to criminal penalties based upon the ‘reasonable expectation (and) fear’ of the person being photographed," Tash said. "It doesn’t matter whether that person is a movie star in Malibu or a convicted embezzler in Milwaukee."
 Tash pointed out that the premise of the bill — protection — is covered through various state laws. "Laws already exist to preserve personal safety and public order," he said. "These laws have already been applied to restrain some photographers and punish their excesses already.

The American Society of Newspaper Editors, with 870 members, is an organization of the main editors of daily newspapers in the United States and Canada.  Founded in 1922, ASNE’s principal purpose is to serve as a medium for exchange of ideas and the professional growth and development of its members.

© Copyright 2006 The American Society of Newspaper Editors
11690B Sunrise Valley Drive | Reston, VA 20191-1409 | Phone 703-453-1122