Gods, Religion and Supernatural Matters

 
Bugul's picture

Had a perusal over the three pages and couldn't find a God thread, so here it is.

Kansas City Bishop Indicted For Failing To Report Abuse

Quote:
KANSAS CITY, Mo. — A bishop in the Roman Catholic Church has been indicted for failure to report suspected child abuse, the first time in the 25-year history of the church’s sex abuse scandals that the leader of an American diocese has been held criminally liable for the behavior of a priest he supervised.

The indictment of the bishop, Robert W. Finn, and the Diocese of Kansas City-St. Joseph by a county grand jury was announced Friday. Each was charged with one misdemeanor count involving a priest accused of taking pornographic photographs of girls as recently as this year. They pleaded not guilty.

The case caused an uproar among Catholics in Kansas City this year when Bishop Finn acknowledged that he knew of the photographs last December but did not turn them over to the police until May. During that time, the priest, the Rev. Shawn Ratigan, allegedly continued to attend church events with children, and took lewd photographs of another young girl.

A decade ago the American bishops pledged to report suspected abusers to law enforcement authorities — a policy also recommended last year by the Vatican. Bishop Finn himself had made such a promise three years ago as part of a $10 million legal settlement with abuse victims in Kansas City.

Though the charge is only a misdemeanor, victims’ advocates immediately hailed the indictment as a breakthrough, saying that until now American bishops have avoided prosecution despite documents showing that in some cases they were aware of abuse.

“This is huge for us,” said Michael Hunter, director of the Kansas City chapter of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, and a victim of sexual abuse by a priest. “It’s something that I personally have been waiting for years to see, some real accountability. We’re very pleased with the prosecuting attorney here to have the guts to do it.” The bishop signaled he would fight the charges with all his strength. He said in a statement: “We will meet these announcements with a steady resolve and a vigorous defense.”

The indictment announced on Friday by the Jackson County prosecutor, Jean Peters Baker, had been under seal since Oct. 6 because the bishop was out of the country. He returned Thursday night.

In a news conference, Ms. Baker said the case was not religiously motivated, but was about the obligation under state law to report child abuse.

“This is about protecting children,” she said.

If convicted Bishop Finn would face a possible fine of up to $1,000 and a jail sentence of up to a year. The diocese faces a possible fine of up to $5,000.

Ms. Baker said that secrecy rules for grand jury proceedings prohibited her from discussing whether other charges were considered, such as child endangerment, a felony. But she said the fact that the bishop faces a single misdemeanor count should not diminish the seriousness.

“To my knowledge a charge like this has not been leveled before,” she said.

It also may not mark the end of the legal troubles facing the diocese in the case, which includes civil and criminal cases in federal court. Last month Bishop Finn and Msgr. Robert Murphy testified before another grand jury in neighboring Clay County. A spokesman for the prosecutor’s office there declined to comment.

The priest accused of taking the lewd photos, Father Ratigan, was a frequent presence in a Catholic elementary school next to his parish. The principal there sent a letter to the diocese in May 2010 complaining about Father Ratigan’s behavior with children. Then, last December, a computer technician discovered the photos on the priest’s laptop and turned the computer in to the diocese. A day later Father Ratigan tried to kill himself. The diocese said that one of its officials described — but did not share — a single photo of a young girl, nude from the waist down, to a police officer who served on an independent sexual abuse review board for the diocese. The officer said that based on the description, it might meet the definition of child pornography but he did not think it would, the diocese said.

Bishop Finn sent Father Ratigan to live in a convent and told him to avoid contact with minors. But until May the priest attended children’s parties, spent weekends in the homes of parish families, hosted an Easter egg hunt and presided, with the bishop’s permission, at a girl’s First Communion, according to interviews with parishioners and a civil lawsuit filed by a victim’s family.

Parents in the school and parishioners — told only that Father Ratigan had fallen sick from carbon monoxide poisoning — were stunned when he was arrested in May after the diocese called the police. He was indicted by a federal grand jury on charges of taking indecent photographs of young girls.

The new indictment released on Friday said that Bishop Finn and the diocese had reason to suspect that Father Ratigan might subject a child to abuse.

It cited: “previous knowledge of concerns regarding Father Ratigan and children; the discovery of hundreds of photographs of children on Father Ratigan’s laptop, including a child’s naked vagina, upskirt images and images focused on the crotch; and violations of restrictions placed on Father Ratigan.”

Bishop Finn said in his statement on Friday that he and the diocese had given “complete cooperation” to law enforcement. He also pointed to steps he had taken since the scandal first became public, including commissioning a report to look into the case, and reinforcing procedures for handling allegations of abuse.

That report found that the diocese did not follow its own procedures. It also found that Bishop Finn was “too willing to trust” Father Ratigan.

The case has generated fury at the bishop, a staunch theological conservative who was already a polarizing figure in his diocese. Since the Ratigan case came to light, there have been widespread calls for him to resign.

Contributing to the sense of betrayal is the fact that only three years ago, Bishop Finn settled lawsuits with 47 plaintiffs in sexual abuse cases for $10 million and agreed to a list of 19 preventive measures, among them to immediately report anyone suspected of being a pedophile to law enforcement authorities.

France may be the only country where a bishop has been convicted for his failure to supervise a priest accused of abuse, according to Terrence McKiernan, president of BishopAccountability.org, a victims’ advocacy group that tracks abuse cases.

A grand jury in Philadelphia indicted a top official in the archdiocese there, Msgr. William Lynn, for mishandling cases of abuse. The former archbishop, Cardinal Anthony Bevilacqua, was not indicted, but he has been called to testify.

Elmlea's picture

I didn't really participate in the old God thread, but isn't this just a story about abuse that happens to have been committed by a priest, rather than a religious issue?

"What follows is an interview with Bruce Grove. I hope you enjoy it just as much as I enjoyed interviewing Bruce Grove. Anyway, please enjoy the interview."
Live & Gamecentre: Elmlea
Twitter: ElmleaUK
3DS: 3265-5213-9206
Bugul's picture

No.

hands of blue's picture

It's not an isolated incident within the Catholic church. Less to do with the religion itself and more to do with the powerful institutions that religion can create, which is in itself a problem. A secular heirarchical society that institutionalises cover-ups so as to not attract negative attention? Something has gone wrong with this religion that holds itself to high moral standards. What's that principle where people give over their ability to make moral decisions when they are told to do something by someone they deem to have authority?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't the Vatican send letters out telling their bishops to cover up any incidents of abuse? That's one mighty corruption of power if you ask me.

Elmlea's picture

Bugul wrote:
No.


With discussion like this, I'm quite glad I didn't bother with the thread in the old forum then.

"What follows is an interview with Bruce Grove. I hope you enjoy it just as much as I enjoyed interviewing Bruce Grove. Anyway, please enjoy the interview."
Live & Gamecentre: Elmlea
Twitter: ElmleaUK
3DS: 3265-5213-9206
hands of blue's picture

There we go, I'll just ramble on and you can provide the evidence for me :D

This is the authority experiment thing

igorgetmeabrain's picture

Here we go again...
There is no god.
Done (and in under one page too).

pantyfire's picture

And with this very proclamation, Igor became what he was so keen to denounce.
All kneel before our new overlord.

So it is written in the book of Teh Edge.

Gamertag: sgt pantyfire PSN: pantyfire Wii: What's yours?...Yeh thought so.

Spock's picture

If the universe is expaning then what is it expaning into? Singularities (black hos) at their core are infinitely heavy and infinitely small, so they shouldn't/don't exist, yet they do and they have 'edges' or 'lhorizons' which they shouldn't, which are maintained by the process of the exchange of the singularity sucking in EVERYTHING in and somehow firing out protons Also, I can't get laid...there is no god.

B³ano's picture

Well I am glad Spock is here.

Facewon's picture

I watched a Debate with Russell Blackford and some other chaps yesterday. It was frustrating, but interesting enough. If I can find a link that will work in the UK I'll post it.

Hi.
Bugul's picture

I bloody love God.

igorgetmeabrain's picture

Yeah, you should totally start a 'Institutionally ignored rape' thread instead.

Bugul's picture

Peace and Love. Peace and Love.

igorgetmeabrain's picture

It's just not really news any more is it?
I'm a little bored of hearing about it just as I'm bored of the militant atheism and endlessly recycled arguments that characterised much of the old God Thread.
We don't really need another 200 pages of the same again.

EDIT: Woah random post editing from Bugul.

Bugul's picture

Sorry I was being a bit naughty there - if passive aggression is waged on a severe and obvious level, is that shit still passive? - and I am sorry that you're tired of my brand of militant atheism which is actually more to do with the rule of law being applied equally to old bods in priestly collars and this here country which I am currently occupying actually getting up off their arse and doing something about the rape and torture of children - p'raps we can get some brand new crimes against humanity that the Catholic Church have been responsible for?

That it isn't new or news to you, is I'm afraid, quite irrelevant. This fellow was the first fellow who has actually met the law in America, that is a bit of a big deal. But oh well reduce it to your glib little arse what you are comically mirroring of your impression of militant atheism. There's no God people! That's not my point, that's not at the heart of the majority of Facewon's posts. So yeah, please old simplifier look inward and look at the many varied varieities of militant atheism - some of which are fucking awesome for the community btw. (I treat the cripples fucking great.)

Bugul's picture

Ah look there's enough hate going on. Sorry about dumping on you. Carry on with your ideas about my ideas even if they're the wrong ideas.

igorgetmeabrain's picture

I wasn't talking about you when I was referring to militant atheism and I quite agree with you that the Catholic church needs bringing to its knees for its appalling legacy of child abuse and its continued and concerted efforts to conceal it.
I'm just of an apathetic frame of mind presently - I can't summon up the energy to be angry about stuff like this at the moment.
Hence my rather flippant (but most probably wholly accurate) 'there is no god' remark.

Skerret's picture

Just like fuckin' Saigon, hey Slick?!

Someone bring back m00nkeh, and SomeGuy.

Jimmy_The_Lips wrote: A hairy baby with a hole in its head that you want to stick your poky stick into. Yes.

XBL, PSN, Steam: Skerret  Minecraft handle: CustomCosy