Upper house

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For the demesne in The Keys to the Kingdom series, see The House
Question book-new.svg
 This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (January 2008)
Legislature
This series is part of the Politics series
Politics Portal · edit

An upper house, often called a senate, is one of two chambers of a bicameral legislature, the other chamber being the lower house; a legislature composed of only one house is described as unicameral.

Contents

[edit] Possible specific characteristics

An upper house is usually distinct from the lower house in at least one of the following respects:

  • It has less power than the lower house.
  • Only limited legislative matters, such as constitutional amendments, require its approval.
  • It is a house of review which cannot initiate or veto legislation, but only consider matters raised by the lower house.
  • It has (in presidential systems) the sole power to try impeachments against the executive, following enabling resolutions passed by the lower house.
  • Its members are often not popularly elected; membership may be hereditary or by appointment.
  • Its members may be elected with a different voting system to the lower house (for example, upper houses in Australia and its states are usually elected by proportional representation, whereas lower houses are not).
  • Its members represent administrative divisions of a federation.
  • It has fewer seats than the lower house.
  • Members' terms are longer than in the lower house, and may be for life.
  • Members are elected in portions, for staggered terms, rather than all at one time.
  • It cannot be dissolved.

[edit] Powers

The Canadian Senate chamber at Parliament Hill in Ottawa, Ontario.
Inside the Australian Senate

[edit] Parliamentary systems

In parliamentary systems the upper house is frequently seen as an advisory or "revising" chamber; for this reason its powers of direct action are often reduced in some way. Some or all of the following restrictions are often placed on upper houses:

  • Lack of control over the executive branch.
  • No absolute veto of proposed legislation, though suspensive vetoes are permitted in some states.
  • A reduced role in initiating legislation.
  • No power to block supply (a rare example of a Parliamentary upper house with the power to block supply is the Australian Senate, which notably exercised that power in 1975)

The role of a revising chamber is to scrutinise legislation that may have been drafted over-hastily in the lower house, and to suggest amendments that the lower house may nevertheless reject if it wishes to. An example is the British House of Lords. Under the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949, the House of Lords can no longer prevent the passage of most bills, but it must be given an opportunity to debate them and propose amendments, and can thereby delay the passage of a bill with which it disagrees. It is sometimes seen as having a special role of safeguarding the Constitution of the United Kingdom and important civil liberties against ill-considered change. Even without a veto, an upper house may defeat legislation. Its opposition may give the lower chamber a chance to reconsider or even abandon a controversial measure. It can also delay a bill so that it does not fit within the legislative schedule, or until a general election produces a new lower house that no longer wishes to proceed with the bill.

Nevertheless, some states have long retained powerful upper houses. For example, the consent of the upper house to legislation may be necessary (though, as noted above, this seldom extends to budgetary measures). Constitutional arrangements of states with powerful upper houses usually include a means to resolve situations where the two houses are at odds with each other.

In recent times, Parliamentary systems have tended to weaken the powers of upper houses relative to their lower counterparts. Some upper houses have been abolished completely (see below); others have had their powers reduced by constitutional or legislative amendments. Also, conventions often exist that the upper house ought not to obstruct the business of government for frivolous or merely partisan reasons. These conventions have tended to harden with passage of time.

[edit] Presidential systems

In presidential systems, the upper house is frequently given other powers to compensate for its restrictions:

  • Executive appointments, to the cabinet and other offices, usually require its approval.
  • It frequently has the sole authority to give consent to or denounce foreign treaties.

[edit] Institutional structure

There is great variety in the way an upper house's members are assembled: by direct or indirection election, appointment, heredity, or a mixture of these. The German Bundesrat is composed of members of the cabinets of the German states, in most cases the state premier and several ministers; they are delegated and can be recalled anytime. In a very similar way the Council of the European Union is composed of national ministers.

Many upper houses are not directly elected, but appointed: either by the head of government or in some other way. This is usually intended to produce a house of experts or otherwise distinguished citizens, who would not necessarily be returned in an election. For example, members of the Canadian Senate are appointed by the Governor General on advice of the Prime Minister.

The seats are sometimes hereditary, as still is partly the case in the British House of Lords and formerly in the Japanese House of Peers until it was abolished in 1947.

It is also common that the upper house consist of delegates chosen by state governments or local officials. The United States Senate was chosen by the State legislatures until the passage of the Seventeenth Amendment in 1913.

The upper house may be directly elected but in different proportions to the lower house - for example, the Senates of Australia and the United States have a fixed number of elected representatives from each state, regardless of the population.

[edit] Abolition

Main article: Abolished upper house

Many jurisdictions, such as Denmark, Sweden, Croatia, Hungary, Peru, Venezuela, New Zealand, and most Canadian provinces, once possessed upper houses but abolished them to adopt unicameral systems. Newfoundland had a Legislative Council prior to joining Canada, as did Ontario when it was Upper Canada and Quebec from 1791 (as Lower Canada) to 1968. Nebraska is the only state in the United States with a unicameral legislature, having abolished its lower house in 1934.

The Australian state of Queensland also once had an appointed Legislative Council before abolishing it in 1922. All other Australian states continue to have bicameral systems. Like Queensland, the German state of Bavaria had an appointed upper house, the Senate of Bavaria, from 1946 to 1999.

The Senate of the Philippines was abolished – and restored – twice: from 1935 to 1945 when a unicameral National Assembly convened, and from 1972 to 1987 when Congress was closed, and later a new constitution was approved instituting a unicameral Parliament. The Senate was re-instituted with the restoration of a bicameral Congress via a constitutional amendment in 1941, and via adoption of a new constitution in 1987.

The current government of Ireland has promised a national referendum on abolition of the Seanad Éireann during the current parliamentary term.

[edit] Titles of upper houses

[edit] Common terms

[edit] Unique titles

[edit] See also

Upper houses of national legislatures
Upper houses
Related
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Upper_house&oldid=489137464"
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export
Languages