About us Login Get email updates
County Fair
Print

Remember The Last Time Right-Wing Bloggers Tried to "Vet" Obama?

May 09, 2012 10:18 am ET by Eric Boehlert

The publication last week of an excerpt from a forthcoming Barack Obama biography sparked an especially frenzied response from conservative bloggers who view the president's distant personal past with an unhealthy fascination.  

The book's new revelation about the identity of a girlfriend Obama had soon after he graduated college nearly 30 years ago, along with the other biographical nuggets, were deemed to be crucial pieces of information that had gone missing during the 2008 campaign season. Washington Examiner columnist Byron York bemoaned the fact that the Vanity Fair excerpt revealed "a portrait of Obama that might have enriched the voters' understanding of him in the 2008 campaign."

Indeed, for conservatives, previously unearthed details about Obama post-college girlfriend represented the latest piece of evidence that reporters hadn't done enough digging during the previous campaign. That they never grilled the candidate; that they ignored the Rev. Jeremiah Wright story! (Fact: They covered it. Exhaustively.)

But this time around, it's going to be different. Obama's (supposedly mysterious) life story is going to be fleshed out during the 2012 campaign.

Under the headline, "Re-Vetting Wars: Obama's Girlfriends Speak," American Thinker blogger Thomas Lifton noted "One of the foremost concerns of the Obama re-election effort is the promised re-vetting of Obama, playing off the widespread perception that the media utterly failed to investigate the reality beneath the highly manufactured identity peddled in 2008."

That vow to "vet" the president has become a mantra this year. Addressing CPAC this winter, Andrew Breitbart declared "[T]his election we're going to vet him," and specifically promised to "vet" Obama's "college days." (Days after Breitbart died in March, his site unveiled the "college days" vetting he had promised; it did not go well for Team Breitbart.)

That same month, Sean Hannity announced it was clear that Obama's "friends" in the press made sure "that his past remains un-vetted," while Hannity's angry guest Michelle Malkin reported it was time to "vet the prez."

The vetting obsession however, doesn't spring from a natural affinity for fact checking. Instead, it's used to bolster the broader conservative argument that the real reason Obama won an electoral landslide victory in 2008 was because the press (purposefully) hid the truth about who Obama really is. And, by extension, if Obama wins re-election in November, the only reason will be because for his four years in office, the press (purposefully) hid the truth about who Obama really is.

The conspiracy theory serves as a convenient catchall excuse for why Obama succeeds electorally despite the conservative press' depiction of him as a monster determined to destroy the American economy and ruin our way of life.  That's all accurate, the bloggers insists. It's just that the liberal media hasn't properly conveyed all the crucial information to voters.

The far right's vetting pledge isn't a new one, though. In fact, bloggers today are far too modest when they suggest Obama hasn't been vetted. They did it themselves! And oh what a memorable job they did. (The blogger and satirist known as Jon Swift did the masterful job in 2008 of detailing the attempted vetting.)

Here's a look back at some of the shocking revelations and allegations conservatives made four years about Obama's life, and some of the sites that initially trumpeted them:

-While attending Columbia University in the early 1980's during the South African divestiture movement, Obama was involved in violent protests, including domestic terrorist bombings, that erupted when a South African rugby team toured America.  (Just One Minute, Ace of Spades).

-Obama had an affair with a young female staffer who was promptly exiled to a Caribbean country by an angry Michelle Obama after she discovered the blossoming relationship.  (Ace of Spades, JammieWearingFool, Say Anything, Confederate Yankee)

-Obama once had gay sex in the back of a limousine. (WorldNetDaily, Jawa Report)

-Obama's deeply personal memoir, Dreams from My Father, was actually ghost-written by Bill Ayers, the former '60's radical-turned-college professor who Obama met in Chicago in the 1990's.  (National Review Online, American Thinker, Ace of Spades, Powerline, Flopping Aces, Ann Althouse.)

-Malcolm X is Obama's father. (Atlas Shrugs)

-Obama was not born in the United States, and therefore not eligible to President. The birth certificate his campaign posted online to debunk that story was actually a forgery; he really born in Kenya. (Right Wing News, Atlas Shrugs, National Review Online, to name just a few.)

And don't forget about the right-wing attempts to "vet" the 2008 campaign and to report out the blockbuster stories the timid mainstream press refused to touch:

-When Obama went to visit his ailing grandmother in Hawaii weeks before Election Day, he was really traveling there in order to deal with the controversy surrounding his birth certificate. (Jerome Corsi)

-Michelle Obama did a campaign interview with something called African Press International where she condemned "American white racists" who were bringing up issues of Obama's citizenship. (Stop the ACLU, Newsbusters, Jim Treacher, Gateway Pundit, Town Hall)

You get the idea.

The point is, right-wing bloggers can whine all they want about Obama not being vetted, but they had their chance to do it in 2008. These same bloggers blew it though, by trafficking in some of the most absurd, un-thinking conspiracy theories imaginable.

Expect this year to be more of the same.

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by thaneb (2 hours and 58 minutes ago)
      3  
      It's clear. An Obama insider is leaking these inane background snippets and misinformation to moles in the Right-Wing new media so it will be discredited ;)
      Report Abuse
      • Author by JudgeSmails (2 hours and 11 minutes ago)
          5
        Obama doesn't need vetting. Just read "Dreams of my Father".

        Sure, some of the people & situations are made up and the timeline doesn't really follow reality, but you should never let true facts get in the way of a good story.

        Even without Obama's help, people have discovered just what kind of person he really is.

        Finally.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by CoolSlaw (2 hours and 7 minutes ago)
          5  
          Didn't get the top post, but you got your comment in right under it I see! Yay for you!

          Even without Obama's help, people have discovered just what kind of person he really is.


          What are the crazy things in that book that haven't been vetted or discussed in the mainstream media if I might ask?
          Report Abuse
          • Author by whatIthink (59 minutes ago)
            3  
            Don't bother asking any questions about the content of the book. I highly doubt (s)he's read it and will just regurgitate right wing talking points and in a smug, self satisfied attitude, thinks he's made some great political point.

            Report Abuse
          • Author by jonimacaroni1 (44 minutes ago)
            1  
            This is an old troll with a new name, likely "jamesB", using the same old tricks - *replying* to the first post in order to get his off-topic, demonstrably false post an inordinate amount of attention.
            Report Abuse
          • Author by SoloPocono (21 minutes ago)
            1  
            It doesn't matter-they don't actually read the book, the just listen to people like Beck, (who also hasn't read it, but refers to it often), who TELL them WHAT to believe. Beck is getting 3 of his "mockumentaries" ready, On Obama, to "Vet him"-so get ready for some doozies!!!
            Also, I got a "newsletter" from some obtuse right-wing blog the other day and was in hysterics for an hour!! Did you all know that Rahm & Obama own a male prostitution house in Chicago???!!
            Road trip anyone? ;)
            Report Abuse
    • Author by Bob Stanley (2 hours and 54 minutes ago)
      3  
      Ever notice that Sarah Palin's favorite word is "vet?"
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Imbecile (2 hours and 41 minutes ago)
        5  
        That's because it's so easy to remember, and it's only 3 letters long.

        You vetcha.
        Report Abuse
      • Author by phlcstgan (2 hours and 37 minutes ago)
        4  
        Odd, considering she's so fond of killing animals.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by peebs755 (2 hours and 51 minutes ago)
      4  
      Jeez. It never ceases to amaze. Just when you think "well that's as stupid as they can get", they pull out some other nugget that shows their idiocy knows no depth.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by fourempties (2 hours and 44 minutes ago)
      4  
      They need to get Donald Trump on this. He did such of masterful job on his last foray into Birtherism.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by tbone (2 hours and 43 minutes ago)
      7  
      As Jon Stewart has pointed out repeatedly, Obama has been in the White House for 4 years; he has a record to run on (or from). Obama can be evaluated on his budgets, his speeches, his legislative initiatives, his trade policies, his domestic policies, his performance as CIC, etc., etc., etc.

      The "vet" is nothing but a continuation of the GOP smear campaign to try and create a narrative of: the "other", the "angry black man", the "left-wing radical", the "socialist", the "Muslim", . . . . .This will be just as ineffective in 2012 as it was in 2008.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Imbecile (2 hours and 39 minutes ago)
        5  
        They can't run against policy, because Republicans have spent the entire Obama presidency doing nothing. Any run on policies will reveal that, so expect them to do avoid it whenever possible.

        Except, of course, expect them to trot out their "failed economic policies" talking point, which they are never asked to expand upon.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by Turkeysocks (1 hour and 18 minutes ago)
          2  
          They can run on policies, because Republicans have worked towards saving America from Obama's "communist/socialist/nazi/dictator" policies... oh, I guess that doesn't cover the fact that Obama has tried to compromise with them on almost every turn.
          Report Abuse
    • Author by shaggles (2 hours and 15 minutes ago)
      5  
      Obama was vetted up the wazoo in 2008. Apparently for the right it's not really vetting unless it topples the Democratic candidate.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by CoolSlaw (2 hours and 10 minutes ago)
      8  
      ...sparked an especially frenzied response from conservative bloggers who view the president's distant personal past with an unhealthy fascination.


      I love Eric Boehlert's prose. That is so dead on.

      I suppose we can look forward to another round of digging up the president's "super secret double dog dare" past that the "liberal media" doesn't want you to know!

      What a job it must be to make this stuff up. This kind of stuff is funny when it's in a supermarket tabloid rag, but these clowns claim to be some kind of actual journalists.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by Chameo (1 hour and 42 minutes ago)
        2  
        Seriously, they need to all collaborate on a V.C. Andrews type gothi-horror-multi-generational conspiracy thingie-ma-bob. Their view of the president's life would make an awesome plotline for those degenerate "Flowers in the Attic" almost-porn novels that were -everywhere- I looked when I lived down South. I was 19 back then and can be forgiven for indulging in reading the cr@p -- these are adults who apparently not only swallowed it whole, but thought they reflect what real life is like... or maybe their real lives are this convoluted and trashy. If that's the case, it's just another case of projection.
        Report Abuse
    • Author by MickD (25 minutes ago)
         
      I'd so much like to hear more about George Dubya and his "youthful indiscretions" because he will never admit them. Some of rightwad bloggers should do a line by line comparison, emphasis on the word "line."
      Report Abuse