Subscribe now

Environment

Home |Environment | News

Climate change may supersize sweet potatoes

RISING levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere may have a silver lining: doubling the size of the sweet potato, the fifth most important food crop in the developing world.

Most studies of the effects of higher atmospheric CO2 on crops have shown rising yields of rice, wheat and soy. The hardy sweet potato is increasingly becoming a staple in Africa and Asia, producing "more edible energy per hectare per day than wheat, rice or cassava", according to research group the International Potato Center.

Hope Jahren at the University of Hawaii at Manao and colleagues grew the plants at four CO2 concentrations: the current level of 390 parts per million, as well as 760, 1140 and 1520 ppm. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts that atmospheric CO2 levels will be between 500 and 1000 ppm by the year 2100.

For the least extreme scenario at 760 ppm, the team found the tubers grew up to 96 per cent larger.

The team is now testing their nutrient content. "Are these sweet potatoes any more nutritious," asks team member Ben Czeck, "or do you have to eat twice as many to get the nutrients needed?" Crucially, previous studies revealed the protein content in wheat, rice, barley and potatoes dropped by 15 per cent when grown under CO2 levels double those of today.

Czeck will present the work in December at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco.

Issue 2892 of New Scientist magazine
  • Subscribe to New Scientist and you'll get:
  • New Scientist magazine delivered every week
  • Unlimited access to all New Scientist online content -
    a benefit only available to subscribers
  • Great savings from the normal price
  • Subscribe now!
print
send

If you would like to reuse any content from New Scientist, either in print or online, please contact the syndication department first for permission. New Scientist does not own rights to photos, but there are a variety of licensing options available for use of articles and graphics we own the copyright to.

Have your say

Only subscribers may leave comments on this article. Please log in.

Only personal subscribers may leave comments on this article

Subscribe now to comment.

What About Warming?

Thu Nov 22 10:48:01 GMT 2012 by Eric Kvaalen

They increased the CO2 level but they didn't increase the temperature. The higher the CO2 level, the higher the temperature will be, and according to a recent New Scientist article, the overall effect on wheat and soy is to decrease yields. See (long URL - click here) and http://www.nber.org/papers/w13799.pdf

As for nutritional content, surely the CO2 wouldn't have much effect on the number of calories per gram of sweet potato. Sweet potatoes are not usually considered a good source of protein.

What About Warming?

Thu Nov 22 14:27:07 GMT 2012 by Tom Andersen

Eric,

(Re: paper you quote).

Do you really believe that crop yields in the USA will drop by 31% (best case) to 79% (worst case) in the the next 87 years?

Its a funny paper in that they predict that corn yields will fall everywhere in the USA with increasing temperature, even in north Wisconsin for example.

I can't follow how they go from how much a crop grows in one day to expected overall yield.

What About Warming?

Thu Nov 22 19:56:32 GMT 2012 by Eric Kvaalen

The authors themselves admit that the true effect would not be as bad as what they say, because farmers can plant earlier in the year when it's cooler ("These rather dire predictions hold growing areas and planting dates fixed"). But they go on to say, "A sensitivity check shows that moving planting dates one month forward would mitigate damages somewhat but would still result in sizeable impacts."

They say early in the paper that maize grows best at 29°C, which is 84.2°F. It does get that hot in northern Wisconsin, and with global warming it could go higher, and thus decrease the yield.

Without actually reading the whole paper, I think they model the distribution of temperature (or "heat") and estimate the yield on the basis of that.

What About Warming?

Thu Nov 22 21:42:44 GMT 2012 by David R Allen

Cassava becomes toxic to humans as you increase C02. Cassava feeds a third of the worlds population.

Research results here.

http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/2891924.htm

What About Warming?

Fri Nov 23 02:38:57 GMT 2012 by Karl

"The higher the CO2 level, the higher the temperature will be..."

That's only true if you average the earth as a whole. You could grow the plants at a higher altitude or in a different season.

A small increase in altitude has a large effect on temperature but a small effect on the partial pressure of CO2.

What About Warming?

Fri Nov 23 05:29:08 GMT 2012 by Eric Kvaalen

That's true. But I think the goal of the research was probably to know what would happen to the crops of people living in a given place.

It's true that they could plant earlier in places where the sweet potatoes are grown presently during a summer season. But in the tropics there's not much difference between summer and winter and maybe the people grow sweet potatoes all year long already.

The paper I cited above says that even if US farmers plant earlier, there would be a sizable negative impact on yields of wheat, maize, and cotton if the temperature goes up.

What About Warming?

Sat Nov 24 06:23:30 GMT 2012 by CA

Sweet potatoes are the main staple in many poor countries despite their low protein content. If that content were to be further reduced, this would be a great hardship.

What About Warming?

Sat Nov 24 16:51:45 GMT 2012 by Eric Kvaalen

That's true.

Climate Change May Supersize Sweet Potatoes

Fri Nov 23 14:51:50 GMT 2012 by W G Treharne
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21628924.300-climate-change-may-supersize-sweet-potatoes.html

Not only should we think of stopping population growth, we ought to reduce the population as well.

Is the CO2 take-up any greater for sweet potatoes as the CO2 level rises?

Climate Change May Supersize Sweet Potatoes

Fri Nov 23 18:43:17 GMT 2012 by Eric Kvaalen

Obviously if they grow faster they're taking up CO2 faster.

All comments should respect the New Scientist House Rules. If you think a particular comment breaks these rules then please use the "Report" link in that comment to report it to us.

If you are having a technical problem posting a comment, please contact technical support.

print
send
<i>(Image: KeystoneUSA-ZUMA/Rex Features)</i>

(Image: KeystoneUSA-ZUMA/Rex Features)

ADVERTISEMENT

Gas explosion in Springfield points to ageing pipes

18:24 27 November 2012

Gas company officials attributed natural gas explosion on 23 November to human error, but the pipeline's corrosion made it susceptible to puncture

North Korea: What a terrible state to get into

12:00 27 November 2012

Few westerners have visited the world's most secretive state. Ecologist Keith Bowers was invited in to help restore its environment, and was shocked by what he saw

Mega-risks that could drive us to extinction

17:26 26 November 2012

Technological hazards that could wipe out the human race will be studied by a proposed research centre at the University of Cambridge

UK consumers lose their taste for green energy

16:39 26 November 2012

In a world of rising energy costs and consumer alarm, UK energy policy continues to lack focus, says Michael Brooks

Latest news

Gas explosion in Springfield points to ageing pipes

18:24 27 November 2012

Gas company officials attributed natural gas explosion on 23 November to human error, but the pipeline's corrosion made it susceptible to puncture

Today on New Scientist: 27 November 2012

18:00 27 November 2012

All today's stories on newscientist.com, including: life in Antarctic isolation, North Korea, disease comeback in Europe, Carl Sagan, and more

Banished diseases making a comeback in Europe

16:52 27 November 2012

The economic crisis, warmer weather, and tropical migrants are stoking the resurgence of mosquito-borne diseases in Europe

Visions of the cosmos honour Carl Sagan

16:12 27 November 2012

A new art installation pays tribute to the cosmologist by generating visions of stars and galaxies out of nearly 12,000 LEDs

TWITTER

New Scientist is on Twitter

Get the latest from New Scientist: sign up to our Twitter feed

ADVERTISEMENT

© Copyright Reed Business Information Ltd.