Reviews

Life Of Pi

5

Ang Lee, the deep blue sea… in 3D!

Adaptations of supposedly unfilmable novels are currently arriving at a rate of knots from smart, audacious directors: Cosmopolis, On The Road, Midnight’s Children, Cloud Atlas

But leading the pack is Ang Lee’s thrillingly conceived and executed take on Yann Martel’s Booker Prize winner.

Cracking the most daunting literary codes has felled many an accomplished filmmaker, from Mike Nichols (Catch-22) to David Lynch (Dune).

What’s more, the omens weren’t looking good for Life Of Pi, with one auteur after another in the frame then out of it (M. Night Shyamalan, Alfonso Cuarón and Jean-Pierre Jeunet).

But then Lee arrived as a shining knight, wielding superior pixel power and warm-blooded empathy. The Taiwanese director - who’s always had a knack for an adap (Sense And Sensibility, The Ice Storm, Brokeback Mountain) - has done handsome justice to Martel’s spellbinding 2001 fable about one boy’s supreme efforts to survive a tragic shipwreck.

Pi-hards will delight at Lee’s strict devotion to Martel’s prose, with only minor deviations to enrich the brew.

What he’s engineered is a lush, liquid 3D masterwork that delivers one breath-snatching image after another, kicking off with French India’s faded colonial grandeur and segueing into a tidal wave of marine magnificence: spectacular typhoons followed by turquoise serenity; the prodigiously-staged sinking of an animal-crammed freighter; a nighttime ocean aglow with luminescent sea-life…

Life Of Pi is a marvel of virtuoso cinematic artistry; it’s also a riveting tale of adventure and endurance, Lee deftly integrating sombre themes into his ocean vistas.

Pi is portrayed by three actors. Newcomer Ayush Tandon is the Indian boy growing up in family-owned Pondicherry Zoo, who reveals how he acquired his bizarre name and arrived at his all-encompassing embrace of three religions: Hinduism, Christianity and Islam.

Slumdog Millionaire’s Irrfan Khan is award-worthy as the Toronto-dwelling adult Pi, recounting his story in flashback to Martel (Rafe Spall) in Lee’s most significant deviation from the source.

Last not least, bearing the brunt of the narrative, is Suraj Sharma as the teenage Pi, who leaves India for Canada with family and menagerie aboard the Japanese cargo ship Tsimtsum, only to watch it sink in a savage storm.

He’s left to fight for survival aboard a lifeboat, his fellow castaways an injured zebra, an orang-utan, a hyena and a ferocious tiger whimsically named Richard Parker. (Needless to say, this unmerry band’s numbers are swiftly whittled down.)

In his first acting role, Sharma proves to be both awesome discovery and mild disappointment.

The former because he rises valiantly to the challenge of bringing the resourceful Pi to life; the latter because Pi’s emotive musings on subsistence and enlightenment, expressed so movingly on the page, aren’t conveyed with as much potency through his performance. It’s a game, auspicious effort, though.

Pi’s feline tormentor, on the other hand, is a monumental creation, vividly brought to life with a mix of animatronics, CGI and reality. Like Caesar in Rise Of The Planet Of The Apes, Richard Parker is another bold leap forward for emotionally resonant digital characters: magnificent, frightening, heartbreaking, and an unceasingly compelling manifestation of wonder within the narrative tapestry.

Martel’s spiritually minded prose, which comes steeped in meditation and metaphor, tips its hat to God-belief while also striking a humanistic chord, maintaining an edge of ambiguity that allows both believer and atheist room for manoeuvre.

There’s a glut of big ideas to wade though in Life Of Pi. As Spall says at one point, “It’s a lot to take in, to figure out what it all means.” (To which the middle-aged Pi responds: “Why does it need to mean anything?”)

But metaphysical musings are more the icing on the cake, as the film also satisfies as an adrenalised, death-defying high-seas adventure.

Where Lee has tinkered, he’s done so with care and an eye to audience sensibilities: gone are the novel’s most horrific animal suffering, the obsessive minutiae of oceanic survival and a hallucinatory episode where Pi dreams up a conversation with Richard Parker.

While hardcore disciples might bemoan its absence, it was a shrewd move leaving it out: there’s enough magic realism here to satiate the greediest appetite. And besides, it probably wouldn’t have sat well with the film’s triumph-of-the-spirit dramatic arc.

As for the novel’s grimly repellent but resonant coda, it remains intact. Ultimately, it’s a tale that revels in unfettered imagination and the possibilities of storytelling, as well as the fierce avoidance of “dry, yeastless factuality” in life.

At times, the narrative gets a bit too misty-eyed at its own lofty purpose. Yet it’s possible that viewers will embrace Lee’s vision with the same fervour as Martel’s readers.

Verdict:

A riot of saturated colour and delirious imagination, Ang Lee’s adap radiates spirituality. But it’s also a simple, thrilling and gently uplifting tale of a boy, a boat and a tiger. Take the plunge.

Film Details

Try This...

Watch the trailer

User Reviews

    • Siban1982

      Nov 23rd 2012, 15:22

      5 stars? Really? But the trailer makes it look like cheese.

      Alert a moderator

    • StevePotter

      Nov 24th 2012, 0:13

      Ang Lee isn't ALWAYS good at adaptations *coughcoughHulkcough*

      Alert a moderator

    • kiranreveur

      Dec 4th 2012, 13:29

      I was lucky enough to go to the premiere last night in London and I must say, this movie was absolutely stunning. A must watch. I enjoyed it more than I thought I would. Ang Lee captured the essence of it all quite beautifully. Some of the scenes were just so imaginative and beautiful.

      Alert a moderator

    • sineadshahrzad

      Dec 20th 2012, 15:41

      A very beautiful and impressive film indeed! The acting is incredible, and I couldn't help but cry, in the end!

      Alert a moderator

    • lovropreprotnik

      Dec 20th 2012, 16:26

      It is directed by great Ang Lee and it is also a big potential to win an Oscar so I think that it is excellent.

      Alert a moderator

    • bugmenot

      Dec 21st 2012, 7:41

      I downloaded this movie from moviesfirecom Its awesome movie!

      Alert a moderator

    • GDRGN

      Dec 21st 2012, 9:16

      It was such a beautiful picture... work of art.. I had tears in my eyes. The visuals were absolutely stunning. But it wasn't just making pretty pictures, it told the story very well. If you get right into it (as I obvs did) you're taken through the devastation, despair and relief Pi goes through- and that's because I find Suraj Sharma's performance as Pi perfect. Get up and go see it now!!!!!!1

      Alert a moderator

    • Toph80

      Dec 26th 2012, 20:01

      @siban1982....clearly you need to watch before making comments like that. I thought the film was really good. Beautifully filmed and the acting was equally as good if not even better espically when you realise that Suraj Sharma who played Pi had never been in any feature film before him landing the role of Pi. The guy in my mind deserves an Oscar nomination. He made you feel everything that he was going through and the last scene of him in the hospital bed talking to the insurance men was amazing as he recounted the "made up" story to them. It had me with a lump in my throat which is something that rarely happens to me.

      Alert a moderator

    • 3459ERICS

      Dec 31st 2012, 10:37

      saw this last nightand all i can say is everyone must of watched a different film , the actings good and the effects are good but in all honesty i was bored not the 5 star masterpeice the review makes it out to be.

      Alert a moderator

    • MikeyRix

      Jan 3rd 2013, 9:59

      Saw it last night...blown away. Wow. Was expecting a 6/10 film but got a 9/10 instead. The marketing for this was pretty bad - it is really not as schmalzy/ cheesy as the trailer makes it look. Not only is it better than its source, it was technically stunning (the detail on Richard Parker, good god) and very, very moving in places. I laughed, I almost-cried, I empathised with the main characters. Tied with "Looper" as my 2012 Top.

      Alert a moderator

    • eugenemorrow

      Jan 5th 2013, 13:32

      Definitely one of the best movies of this year. Lee proves himself to be a master of emotion and colours and delivers a clever tale which is open to both atheists and believers and still manages to leave you in doubts at the end. Life of Pi is a mixture of an artistic beauty and a humble spiritual vision. A bit naive in certain moments but still lovable.

      Alert a moderator

    • PhillTurner

      Jan 6th 2013, 21:09

      Just amazing,

      Alert a moderator

    • mikejeanes

      Jan 10th 2013, 21:33

      I have not read the book, nor do I intend to, and I watched the film in 2D as I cannot stand the thought of wearing 3D glasses over my prescription lenses for the duration of a film. Haviung said that, I enjoyed the visual aspect immensly,but was left wondering if the film mirrored the book and was all style and no substance like so many Booker prize winners. The 227 days in the lifeboat were presumably based on the schoolboy's value of Pi=22/7. The floating island looking like a woman on her back with her head to the left as viewed from the lifeboat is mere fantasy (or hallucination) and the central large pond (or small lake) full of dead fish at night is too obvious to need explanation. The alternative story told by Pi to the wreck investigators reminds me strongly of Homer's Odyssey, where Odysseus first presented marvellous tales of adventure on enchanted islands, and then presented a far more mundane (and believable) account of his long abscence from home. There are many comments elsewhere that the alternative story told by Pi is a letdown, but considering the whole book/film is fiction, the reader/viewer is at liberty to "believe" either, or may instead believe Pi is lying and had no companions, human or animal in the lifeboat. You pays your money and takes your choices. On the other hand, if a Bengal tiger had been left roaming the jungles of Mexico, I rather think the matter would have been reported in the press and be known to the wreck investigators. Mexico is sufficiently densley populated to ensure such an animal would not escape notice for long. In conclusion, I sggest you see the film for the visual impact, but do not expect much of a story.

      Alert a moderator

    • deborahjaden

      Jan 11th 2013, 15:39

      as Matthew explained I didnt even know thatanyone can earn $4521 in four weeks on the computer did you read this site link wow42.com

      Alert a moderator

Leave a comment or submit your review and rating