Biography
Latest posts
Latest comments

Izabella Kaminska joined FT Alphaville in October 2008, which was of course the best time in the world to become a financial blogger. Before that she worked as a producer at CNBC, a natural gas reporter at Platts and an associate editor of BP’s internal magazine. She has also worked as a reporter on English language business papers in Poland and Azerbaijan and was a Reuters graduate trainee in 2004.

For one week in 2003, and one week only, she traveled on her own initiative to Kabul to report on Afghanistan’s emerging business and banking industry. She stayed with mercenaries, which was cool. She later sold the piece to a business magazine, which was also cool.

The experience, however, taught her the valuable lesson of risk/return trade-offs.

Today she prefers to report from the mean streets of Geneva, Switzerland — a notorious European risk-aversion zone.

Everything she knows about economics stems from a childhood fascination with ancient economies, specifically the agrarian land reforms of the early Roman republic and the coinage and price stability reforms of late Roman emperors. Her favourite emperor is one Gaius Aurelius Valerius Diocletian.

She studied Ancient History at UCL, and has a masters in Journalism from what was then the London College of Printing.

And yes, she is also a second-generation West London Pole (who likes mushroom picking, bigos and pierogi).

Contact Izabella Kaminska

Do markets dream of electric androids?

ROBOTS! AUTOMATONS! CYBORGS! ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE! ARGHH!!!

Last weekend I attended Robots on Tour, a robotics, humanoids and cyborg exhibition put together by the Zurich-based Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at the University of Zurich. Read more

Is the commodity sell-off overdone?

The latest commodity advice from Goldman Sachs suggests the current sell-off may be overdone.

Here are the key points from Monday’s note:

Shifting to near-term overweight as commodity sell-off overdone
Commodity markets declined sharply in February along with emerging market (EM) equities due to renewed concerns over China, which we believe is overdone. Although our price targets other than gold remain unchanged, this pull back has pushed our near-term return forecast from 2.0% to 6.0%, making commodities the asset class within the ECS coverage universe with the most robust near-term outlook. However, our 12-month neutral recommendation remains unchanged as our returns forecast is still a more subdued 3.0%, as we continue to remain structurally neutral on long-dated oil and commodity prices due to the structural supply-side response to persistently high prices.

 Read more

On stabilising the gold price

Almost a year ago the Telegraph’s Thomas Pascoe put out an interesting piece on gold. We’ve decided to reprise it this Friday because we think it offers an interesting and useful perspective on current developments in the gold market:

One of the most popular trading plays of the late 1990s was the carry trade, particularly the gold carry trade. In this a bank would borrow gold from another financial institution for a set period, and pay a token sum relative to the overall value of that gold for the privilege.

 Read more

Where is the EEMEA flow?

An interesting anomaly is popping up in the world of Eastern Europe, Middle East, and Africa (EEMEA) flows, note Bank of America Merrill Lynch on Friday:

Investors are puzzled by the lack of EEMEA FX appreciation in spite of G-10 central bank printing. Waiting for the flow may be like Waiting for Godot: you wait and wait, but he never comes. Global rebalancing, deleveraging and higher US rates are responsible for this, in our view. In sum, the flow trends are consistent with the poor performance of EEMEA FX—and insofar as they are unlikely to change, currencies are likely to remain weak. Read more

Apparently you can’t eat gold

Anyone who bought gold in 2008 is probably more than tempted to cash in their profits right about now.

Reflecting the scale of the change in sentiment — and confirming that there was indeed something of a choke level for gold at around the $1,908 mark — is the following chart from Macro Risk Advisors which neatly sums up the degree to which investors have been liquidating gold ETF positions. Read more

We seek inflation here, we seek inflation there…

… the Japanese seek inflation everywhere.

All this talk about Japan, JGB bond yields, QE, the yen… and hardly ever does anyone throw up the following chart.

So, without further ado, here is the most important Japanese chart of all courtesy of Capital Economics… the CPI: Read more

Further reading

Elsewhere on Thursday,

- What happens if people live forever?

- Tracy Alloway gets some MS Paint competition. Or maybe not.

- There is no shortage of gold. Read more

The age of infinite equity?

Financial pundits, academics, fund managers and analysts all have an amazing tendency to over-complicate matters.

Sometimes, however, it takes just one person spelling out the obvious to really get to the root of the problem. Read more

More on the spot and forward price commodity disconnect

An excellent observation from John Kemp over at Reuters on Tuesday regarding the spot/forward disconnect we’ve been talking about:

The increasingly close linkage between hedge funds and spot prices since 2010 has also coincided with a sharp reduction in the correlation between front-month and far-forward prices. Correlation between spot month and forward prices, generally above 90 percent until 2010, is now often less than 50 percent (Charts 5-6). Read more

Record highs and commodity writedowns

On the day the Dow is expected to open at a record high, the hottest M&A story of the year — Glencore and Xstrata — brings us the following.

First the collective news (via the FT): Read more

The (early) Lunch Wrap

HSBC lifts dividend 50% || Kuroda says ‘will do whatever we can’ at BoJ || Nikkei rises, yen little changed || New Chinese property tightening announced || New Look to open shops in China || Swiss vote for pay curbs || Steinmetz launches $2bn distressed European property fund || New homes bonus ‘a flop’ || No end in sight for Italian gridlock  Read more

Further reading

Elsewhere on Monday,

- Opaque finance, again, and solutions.

- Afghanistan’s mobile money revolution.

- Will biotechnology provide food security? Read more

Further reading

Elsewhere on Thursday,

- It’s Frankfurt that should be your worry – not Rome.

- Ricardian equivalence and the case of the EU.

- Aeroflot’s prospective 1-year old board member. Read more

The Closer

ROUND-UP

Stocks soar to five-year high. Wall Street’s S&P 500 had its biggest one-day gain, or 1.3 per cent, since the start of January, supported by a better than expected survey of durable goods orders (excluding transport). Now at 1,515 points, the New York benchmark was striving to recover last week’s five-year closing high of 1,530. The Dow jumped 175 points, or 1.3 per cent to 14,075, its highest level since Oct. 15, 2007. The FTSE All-World equity index added 0.9 per cent and the FTSE Eurofirst advanced 0.9 per cent. Milan’s FTSE MIB index recovered early losses to close higher on the day. Demand for the dollar fell, with the dollar index sliding 0.3 per cent. Copper declined 0.2 per cent to $3.57 a pound while Brent crude fell 0.7 per cent to $111.95 a barrel (Financial Times). Read more

On negative interest rates and hoarding

Okay. Negative interest rates have now gone fully mainstream in the UK thanks to this week’s testimony by Bank of England deputy governor Paul Tucker.

Even the Daily Mail is writing about it.

But a number of major misunderstandings are popping up as a result. So let us try to clear some of them up. Read more

A powerful convexity in short-term Vix futures

Before we comment about the strange behaviour of the Vix this week, we’d like to engage in a bit of a thought experiment.

There are two hypothetical scenarios that we’d like you to consider.

The first relates to the rampant nationalisation of everything:

What happens to market prices and volatility in an economy where government intervention becomes de rigeur every time prices misbehave?

 Read more

The burning of Rome spreads

The political picture in Italy is looking deeply uncertain. We all know that.

But what’s possibly more interesting is the scale of the market reaction to that uncertainty. Read more

Hey, spendy miners, operate Glencore style

Alternate working title: Opec-cartel style

We’ve already heard from Oleg Deripaska on the matter. And we’ve started to see the consequences hit Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton. But the latest “we must rein in supply” Opec-cartel style talk, actually emanates from Glencore CEO Ivan Glasenberg.

Bloomberg has the story ( hat tip to Reuters’ John Kemp) and it offers few cracking paragraphs to say the least: Read more

Further reading

Elsewhere on Tuesday,

- A major lack of Vix convergence.

- Elon Musk mentions the hyperloop again.

- Gasoline’s danger zone. Read more

Are rates mispriced or are investors missing something?

The disconnect we’ve noticed between commodity fundamentals and forward rates appears to be popping up in other asset classes as well.

Priya Misra, rates strategist at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, makes a very interesting point on Friday about what she sees in her sector. Read more

Further reading

Elsewhere on Friday,

- How the eurozone crisis was about a buyer’s strike.

- Perhaps the singularity isn’t going to happen?

- European banks would be less scary if they were in the US. Read more

Unstable commodities

Nymex WTI futures trade experienced somewhat of a wobble on Wednesday.

As Stephen Schork highlights in his chart of the day: Read more

When choked gold responds to hedging demand (and Soros)

Ay ay ay! Gold is approaching a death cross and all sorts of other commodities are looking nasty too.

 Read more

The (early) Lunch Wrap

Kloppers to be replaced by inside geologist || €3.5bn buyout plan for France’s Elior || Italy’s centre-left woos Monti || Bulgaria’s government resigns || Dell shareholders maintain criticism of buyout after earnings fall || Isle of Man tax haven horizon || China FDI falls again || JGB dog that didn’t bark || Markets Read more

Skidelsky on robots and more leisure

Love him or loathe him, Robert Skidelsky’s prose always makes for a good read.

His latest offering comes by way of Project Syndicate and relates to the issue of robots and the rise of automation. To what degree are we really approaching a leisure society and how best to respond to the changes afoot? Read more

Turning mobile money into M0

In our previous post we explained why Jean-François Groff, CEO of Mobino, believes mobile payments systems could be a lot more honest and more money-like.

How does Groff’s company fit into it all? Well, his big idea really is to keep M0 (as economists like to call base money) exactly what it is, M0. Read more

Why central banks should take charge of their digital currencies

The mobile money/virtual currency arena is getting more and more crowded. And the question remains: will the concept ever gain the critical mass needed to become the next big thing in finance?

From Bitcoin to M-pesa, Square, Paypal, Dwolla and Ven (to name just a few) … the number of new concepts is piling up. Read more

A Rosneft hedge distortion?

This is a follow up to Thursday’s post about Rosneft’s 500 million barrel collateralised financing (to raise money for its purchase of BNP-TNK) and how the market managed to absorb it almost without any price impact.

Most of the previous post was based on the observations of Philip. K. Verleger, who believed the latter point represented a triumph for the futures markets, which had reached a whole new level of maturity.

And yet, as we have been reporting, it’s always more important to look to the curve. Spot price, or “flat price” as traders like to call it, is almost irrelevant. What’s happening in so-called time-spreads is usually much more critical. (And yes, nobody usually takes unhedged positions on flat price.) Read more

Did you hear the one about Rosneft’s 500m barrel hedge?

Philip K. Verleger, veteran independent energy consultant, has been doing some sleuthing concerning some of the more opaque areas of the oil market.

What he’s unearthed is interesting, to say the least. Read more

Elon Musk vs The New York Times

Cars and motoring are not really FT Alphaville’s specialty. But we do love public spats.

The current one running between Tesla and SpaceX founder Elon Musk and John Broder of the New York Times is particularly engaging. It regards Broder’s test-drive of the Tesla Model S and his subsequent rubbishing of the experience in an article that claimed the electric car ran out of battery early and generally failed to perform in cold weather. Read more

@greasy wheels - crack spreads are rubbish despite the capacity shutdowns. That's the point! This is about the game of monopoly. Only the distribution of more "200 to pass go" can keep the system afloat. That means more money printing not less. There is no supply issue. The shops are not empty. They have too much product, and this product cannot be sold profitably without more money being distributed to the system.

Comment on: Markets Live: Friday, 8th March, 2013

@bb88 - it might be hard to accept as a consumer, but it impacts the economics greatly. INflation can only be a problem when there is a genunine supply issue, and there is rivalrous competition of too much currency over not enough supply. We have the capacity to flood the system with fuel. We are not doing so because doing so would crash the market.

Comment on: Markets Live: Friday, 8th March, 2013

@DrHans - the only reason the government won't be able to support the system for ever is if we as a global society stop innovating and progressing. If we allow austerity insanity to stop us from moving forward and from redeeming the physical tangible and consumable wealth that is there represented by spare capacity that has to be shut down because it cannot offer goods at a scarce enough rate to ensure a positive return on equity.

We are wealthier than ever before in the west. This is not the soviet republic. There are no queues for goods in empty shops, there are no shortages. If people don't have it's because they have not been given the redemption right, and instead the goods that would otherwise be given away for free go to waste.

What the austerity brigade is doing is essentially trying to take air and sell it back to the people.. but since air is abundant and free, they are literally confiscating air out of the system just so that they can sell it back to you at a profit.

There is no need for this.

I am a historian, and i agree that history is riddled with the unexpected. My point now is that the "crash doom scenario" is by and large much tooo expected. The unexpected is now the opposite... real wealth and a post-capital economy. Bar from a few "social utopians" nobody currently sees that coming.

This time it's the model that may be changing. Going from a debt scarcity economy to an equity stakeholder model. And that's the most unexpected future shock of all, since the implications truly have no historical precedent at all.

Comment on: The age of infinite equity?

@James White CFSGAM - and i agree with you.

Absolutely the reinvestment angle becomes essential, and if firms fail to do that then the democratisation of equity and everyone becoming stakeholders doesn't really happen. Firms won't reinvest at a loss though... hence why you need the money printing. But money is national equity at this point, and just a rationing system devised to allow people to redeem goods (potentially oversupplied by an infinite equity market).

Yes HMV fails... etc. But that's because its model is beyond redundant. Even govt support can't disguise that. But i did a post recently about zombie credit, and generally speaking bankruptcies are much lower than anyone ever expected. Companies that should be going out of business are able to roll debt funding on and on due to government support and as long as they can keep the cash flow going that's all that matters. They survive pointlessly and without real economic purpose. This is exactly what's going on with commodity companies.

But these are still old model corporates. The new model is about corporates that fund primarily through equity, because only a purely equity funded model can be system healthy. Debt at this point disguises the weak, simply because it is so cheap. Hence the rush to de-equitisation and debt funding that my colleague Cardiff is talking about. I talked about it based on Albert Edwards note about companies borrowing to buyback equity.

This de-equitisation trend is about disguising those corporates that don't have infinite equity and stakeholder potential. Its about limiting the amount of equity in the marketplace so that the last bit of performing equity flows to an ever more concentrated amount of hands.

These companies can't deleverage or equity fund because the price discovery process would should there would be no willing takers. This is why we have this breakout in the tech (primarily equity funded) companies vs the old economy. It's about replicating the Dotcom bubble but realising this time round we don't need to raise interest rates because there are no inflationary consequences. And also that a tight job market doesn't necessarily mean what it once used to.. it just means people employed to be most of the time pretty unproductive (a la george jetson) so that money can still be transmitted to people alongside some sort of social and hierarchal protocol.

It's infinite equity because you are either investing in the Dow... in which most companies are deequitising in favour of debt, which will be permanently supported by government... or because you're investing in pure equity funded companies that can afford to be because they are so innovative and socially useful.

It's much harder to differentiate from the socially useful going concerns and those that are not, but really I would argue you look to the debt levels. Debt funding is so cheap for a reason. And if there is a bubble, it's in recognising that the equity funded corporates will continue to outperform the debt funded corporates increasingly.

Someone said there is no wealth effect. I didn't say infinite equity will necessarily make you rich in $ terms (tho i suspect it will for a good while) but rather eventually in stakeholder terms. We all become stakeholders ... or as the communists would have called us "comrades".

I am definitely not a communist. And i think we are letting politics get in the way of calling it what it really is. There is no "capital option" anymore, apart from in emerging markets or areas that still have real poverty and scarcity. This is not me being an anti-capitalist. I have a very favourable view of free markets and capitalism and always have. This is about explaining that unless we democratise equity, and make everyone into stakeholders, you'll only see the deequitisation process concentrate wealth in ever fewer hands. But even that trend stops eventually... because eventually there won't be anything left to de-equitise in the old model.

Comment on: The age of infinite equity?

@finster - thanks very much

Comment on: More on the spot and forward price commodity disconnect

The physical non LME stored market is already in a backwardation...

Comment on: Markets Live: Tuesday, 5th March, 2013

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/07/aluminum-premiums-idUSL5N0B1GNW20130207

Comment on: Markets Live: Tuesday, 5th March, 2013

@fjp73 - precisely

Comment on: Markets Live: Tuesday, 5th March, 2013

@JoP because the contango is being exploited as a yield generator, and ultimately being funded by people still willing to go long the curve based on assumptions of rising demand in the future. Assumptions which are not playing out. The hedges are far too cheap.

Comment on: Markets Live: Tuesday, 5th March, 2013

@JoP - because if the price is wrong (and could well be if the curve is mispriced) then guess what, the risk/reward situation is all wrong. And who ends up holding the risk of non-performing hedges? The CCPs.

Comment on: Markets Live: Tuesday, 5th March, 2013