From Mr John Paris. Sir, In your editorial ‘Our tangled web’ (March 8), you state that ‘internet users are increasingly wary of how their data are being used’
From Dr Kirsty Hughes. Sir, It is a sad day when the Financial Times changes its principled and welcome defence of press freedom in the UK to one of pragmatic compromise
From Mr Barry M. Olliff. Sir, FTSE chief executive Mark Makepeace’s comments highlight the progress that has been achieved by Chinese regulators in attracting foreign institutional investors
From Mr Mark Florman. Sir, Widespread coverage of the apparent initial failure of the Funding for Lending Scheme was strong on problems but short on solutions
From Mr Gary Rawlinson. Sir, In describing Chris Huhne as ‘the disgraced former minister’ and Vicky Pryce as ‘a leading economist’, you have rocked my faith in the FT
From Mr John Bishop. Sir, The suggestion that the UK is headed for stagflation ‘as experienced in the 1970s’ is disproportionate to any likely outcome of the present situation
From Mr Robert M. Sussman. Sir, Ben Bernanke is no more the maestro than Alan Greenspan: the only difference is that the latter created a bubble in housing and the former a bubble in the bond market
From Mr Sebastiano Rizzo. Sir, When Chris Huhne was sentenced in the UK, Italian MPs of the Berlusconi party were demonstrating in Milan over charges filed against their boss
From Mr Darren Cotter. Sir, Am I the only one slightly bemused by the current debate about CEO time being sold to investors by brokers and investment banks?
From Mr A.D.H. Leishman. Sir, Alan Parker and his co-signatories say they ‘passionately believe in the power of the private sector to improve people’s lives’: then let them get on with it
From Dr Kyungjin Song. Sir, I can only hail your editorial and the policy-makers and academics who are pressing the US Congress to act on the 2010 IMF quota and governance reform
From Mr Brian Bollen. Sir, I take strong issue with the assertion by Karan Khemka that ‘the value of a university education is determined by the job it secures later’
From Mr Iain Morrison. Sir, The statement that ‘the value of a university education is determined by the job it secures later’ is the utterance of an impoverished soul