Timeline for Why is processing a sorted array faster than processing an unsorted array?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2019 at 12:26 | history | undeleted |
Shan revo Mihai Alexandru-Ionut |
||
| Mar 16, 2018 at 12:45 | history | edited | Peter Mortensen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Active reading [<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MATLAB>]
|
| Jan 29, 2016 at 1:24 | history | wiki removed | Shog9 | ||
| Jan 28, 2016 at 20:56 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by George Stocker | ||
| Oct 4, 2013 at 18:45 | history | deleted | casperOne | via Vote | |
| Sep 27, 2013 at 1:41 | history | edited | Shan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Aug 24, 2013 at 16:34 | comment | added | Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen | Does matlab use native numbers or a mat lab specific implementation (infinite amount of digits or so?) | |
| May 17, 2013 at 23:50 | comment | added | Shan | Matlab does automatic parallelization / vectorization in many situations but the issue here is to check the effect of branch prediction. Matlab is not immune in anyway! | |
| May 17, 2013 at 19:53 | comment | added | ysap | Just for the sake of completeness, this is probably not how you'd implement that in Matlab. I bet it'd be much faster if done after vectorizing the problem. | |
| Jan 2, 2013 at 14:02 | history | edited | Shan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Dec 30, 2012 at 17:04 | history | edited | Shan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Dec 30, 2012 at 16:39 | history | edited | Shan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Dec 30, 2012 at 16:31 | history | edited | Shan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 252 characters in body
|
| Dec 30, 2012 at 16:16 | history | answered | Shan | CC BY-SA 3.0 |